Search:   Namespaces Discussions .NET v1.1 Feedback

Returning four values from a function... Messages   Related Types This message was discovered on ASPFriends.com 'aspngvb' list. Responses highlighted in red are from those people who are likely to be able to contribute good, authoratitive information to this discussion. They include Microsoft employees, MVP's and others who IMHO contribute well to these kinds of discussions. Greg Quinn Is there any way to return four different values from a function? Greg Reply to this message...        Eric Landes (VIP) Greg, Utilizing VB.net there are a number of ways to do this. One way I'm = using would be to create a colleciton in your class and populate that = collection with your data. This assumes that those values are related in some way = (for instance in order detail lines would be in the orderdetail collection of = the Orders class). Some sample code: Public Class Myclass     Public childCollection As New Collection()     Public Sub GetRecords() ... Code to get your data     childCollection.Add(childObject, childObject.ID)     End Sub end class Not sure if that's what you are looking for. Another way to do it is by utilizing properties in your class, and having your function populate = the properties. Then your calling program could use those properties. I'm not sure that these are the most scalable methods, but I am finding = them very maintainable. But again, my sites are intranets that don't have millions of hits or activity, so keep that in mind. *************************=20 Eric Landes=20 Senior Programmer/Analyst=20 For Articles on Crystal.Net, Datagrids and more check out http://www.aspalliance.com/corporatecoder/ *************************=20 All statements expressed are my own, and do not reflect the opinion of = my employer, unless stated otherwise.=20 -----Original Message----- From: Greg Quinn [mailto:Click here to reveal e-mail address] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 3:53 PM To: aspngvb Subject: [aspngvb] Returning four values from a function... Is there any way to return four different values from a function? Greg Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PARTNERS Health Plan Phone: 574-233-4899 100 E. Wayne St., Suite 502 Fax: 574-234-7484 South Bend, IN 46601 www.partnersindiana.com Reply to this message...        Guillermo E. Rivero Do you want to return the 4 values at the same time ? If so, you can return a structure with the 4 values... If not, you can return an object then cast it to the type you want... Reply to this message...        Tim Maloney One way would be to use a structure structure stMyData Dim strProduct as String Dim dblPrice as Double Dim lngStock as Long End Structure Sub Go() Dim stGet as stMyData stGet = GetData 'Your values from GetData should have been returned Response.Write(stGet.strProduct) End Sub Function GetData() as stMyData Dim stTest as stMyData stTest.strProduct = "Widgets" stTest.dblPrice = "2.54" stTest.lngStock = "25" GetData = stTest End Function If these values are of the same type (meaning it is not a 'record' of sorts) then I believe with the new version you can return arrays. (You may even be able to define an array in a structure but I haven't had need for this as of yet... Tim Maloney Alliance Consulting [Original message clipped] Reply to this message...        joseph.gaus@dowcorning.com Another way would be to define a struct with fields, have your function create an instance of that struct, populate those fields, and pass the struct back as it's return type. -----Original Message----- From: Eric Landes [mailto:Click here to reveal e-mail address] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 9:58 AM To: aspngvb Subject: [aspngvb] RE: Returning four values from a function... Greg, Utilizing VB.net there are a number of ways to do this. One way I'm using would be to create a colleciton in your class and populate that collection with your data. This assumes that those values are related in some way (for instance in order detail lines would be in the orderdetail collection of the Orders class). Some sample code: Public Class Myclass     Public childCollection As New Collection()     Public Sub GetRecords() ... Code to get your data     childCollection.Add(childObject, childObject.ID)     End Sub end class Not sure if that's what you are looking for. Another way to do it is by utilizing properties in your class, and having your function populate the properties. Then your calling program could use those properties. I'm not sure that these are the most scalable methods, but I am finding them very maintainable. But again, my sites are intranets that don't have millions of hits or activity, so keep that in mind. ************************* Eric Landes Senior Programmer/Analyst For Articles on Crystal.Net, Datagrids and more check out http://www.aspalliance.com/corporatecoder/ ************************* All statements expressed are my own, and do not reflect the opinion of my employer, unless stated otherwise. -----Original Message----- From: Greg Quinn [mailto:Click here to reveal e-mail address] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 3:53 PM To: aspngvb Subject: [aspngvb] Returning four values from a function... Is there any way to return four different values from a function? Greg Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PARTNERS Health Plan Phone: 574-233-4899 100 E. Wayne St., Suite 502 Fax: 574-234-7484 South Bend, IN 46601 www.partnersindiana.com | [aspngvb] member Click here to reveal e-mail address = YOUR ID | http://www.asplists.com/asplists/aspngvb.asp = JOIN/QUIT ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________ Reply to this message...        leon jollans Hi Greg,=20 would have thought you have two choices, either use ByRef/ref parameters = or return an array from the function. Don't think there's any other way, = if there is I'd love to know about it. hth Leon -----Original Message----- From: Greg Quinn [mailto:Click here to reveal e-mail address] Sent: 29 July 2002 21:53 To: aspngvb Subject: [aspngvb] Returning four values from a function... Is there any way to return four different values from a function? Greg | [aspngvb] member Click here to reveal e-mail address =3D YOUR ID | http://www.asplists.com/asplists/aspngvb.asp =3D JOIN/QUIT Reply to this message...        Remas Wojciechowski Greg, probably the best way is to define a custom class with 4 properties and have the function return objects of that type. hth Remas http://www.aspalliance.com/remas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Quinn" <Click here to reveal e-mail address> To: "aspngvb" <Click here to reveal e-mail address> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 10:52 PM Subject: [aspngvb] Returning four values from a function... [Original message clipped] Reply to this message...        Greg Quinn So then how do I call these values from my .aspx page? i.e myValue1 = GetRecords.childCollection(1) ??? Greg -----Original Message----- From: Eric Landes [mailto:Click here to reveal e-mail address] Sent: 29 July 2002 06:58 To: aspngvb Subject: [aspngvb] RE: Returning four values from a function... Greg, Utilizing VB.net there are a number of ways to do this. One way I'm using would be to create a colleciton in your class and populate that collection with your data. This assumes that those values are related in some way (for instance in order detail lines would be in the orderdetail collection of the Orders class). Some sample code: Public Class Myclass     Public childCollection As New Collection()     Public Sub GetRecords() ... Code to get your data     childCollection.Add(childObject, childObject.ID)     End Sub end class Not sure if that's what you are looking for. Another way to do it is by utilizing properties in your class, and having your function populate the properties. Then your calling program could use those properties. I'm not sure that these are the most scalable methods, but I am finding them very maintainable. But again, my sites are intranets that don't have millions of hits or activity, so keep that in mind. ************************* Eric Landes Senior Programmer/Analyst For Articles on Crystal.Net, Datagrids and more check out http://www.aspalliance.com/corporatecoder/ ************************* All statements expressed are my own, and do not reflect the opinion of my employer, unless stated otherwise. -----Original Message----- From: Greg Quinn [mailto:Click here to reveal e-mail address] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 3:53 PM To: aspngvb Subject: [aspngvb] Returning four values from a function... Is there any way to return four different values from a function? Greg Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PARTNERS Health Plan Phone: 574-233-4899 100 E. Wayne St., Suite 502 Fax: 574-234-7484 South Bend, IN 46601 www.partnersindiana.com | [aspngvb] member Click here to reveal e-mail address = YOUR ID | http://www.asplists.com/asplists/aspngvb.asp = JOIN/QUIT Reply to this message...        eric landes (VIP) Greg, Something like this: dim myObj as new EricsObject dim myTestString as string myObj.GetRecords myTeststring =3D myobj.Childcollection(1) myobj=3Dnothing Or if you put a struct in there (as others have mentioned), do same type = of code, but call the variable name. HTH Eric ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Quinn" <Click here to reveal e-mail address> To: Click here to reveal e-mail address Sent: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 16:19:39 -0700 Subject: RE: [aspngvb] RE: Returning four values from a function... [Original message clipped] Sent: 29 July 2002 06:58 To: aspngvb Subject: [aspngvb] RE: Returning four values from a function... [Original message clipped] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 3:53 PM To: aspngvb Subject: [aspngvb] Returning four values from a function... [Original message clipped] Reply to this message...        Darren Neimke WW91IGNvdWxkIHBhc3MgYmFjayBhIFN0cnVjdHVyZSBvciBDbGFzcywgb3IgeW91IGNvdWxkIHBh c3MgdGhlIHZhbHVlcyBCeVJlZi4NCg0KCS0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tIA0KCUZy b206IEdyZWcgUXVpbm4gW21haWx0bzpncmVnQGktb25saW5lLmNvLnphXSANCglTZW50OiBUdWUg MzAvMDcvMjAwMiA2OjIyIEFNIA0KCVRvOiBhc3BuZ3ZiIA0KCUNjOiANCglTdWJqZWN0OiBbYXNw bmd2Yl0gUmV0dXJuaW5nIGZvdXIgdmFsdWVzIGZyb20gYSBmdW5jdGlvbi4uLg0KCQ0KCQ0KDQoJ SXMgdGhlcmUgYW55IHdheSB0byByZXR1cm4gZm91ciBkaWZmZXJlbnQgdmFsdWVzIGZyb20gYSBm dW5jdGlvbj8NCgkNCglHcmVnDQoJDQoJDQoJfCBbYXNwbmd2Yl0gbWVtYmVyIGRhcnJlbi5uZWlt a2VAc2RtLmNvbS5hdSA9IFlPVVIgSUQNCgl8IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuYXNwbGlzdHMuY29tL2FzcGxp c3RzL2FzcG5ndmIuYXNwID0gSk9JTi9RVUlUDQoJDQoNCg= Reply to this message...        Peter Brunone Greg, How about returning an array (or other multi-value datatype)? Cheers, Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Quinn" <Click here to reveal e-mail address> [Original message clipped] Reply to this message...        Peter Brunone Tim, Nice approach; I guess I've learned my new thing for today :) Anybody know how expensive structures are? Cheers, Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Maloney" <Click here to reveal e-mail address> [Original message clipped] Reply to this message...        Alex Lowe The structure is less expensive than say a class but provides much of the same functionality. The reason the structure is less expensive is that it is a value type rather than a reference type. What does this mean (value vs. reference)? Well, reference types are stored in a unique location on the managed heap (this means that the only way they are deallocated is by the garbage collector). Value types are types are stored where ever they are used (the exception being something like an array of value types - the array is stored on the managed heap - this is still different than a true reference type however because when you request a value in the array you get a copy of the value rather than a reference to the location of the value). There are other difference between the structure (value type) and say a class (reference type) that have to do with constructors, initialization, lack of inheritance, etc. So, there is a tradeoff between speed/performance and encapsulation. Generally speaking though, if all you care about is a value (or values) and you are not concerned with maintaining a unique instance of a class then a structure will do. Hth, Alex - AspFriends.com Moderation Team Microsoft MVP - ASP.NET *********************************************************** Translate C# code to VB.NET code at http://aspalliance.com/aldotnet/examples/translate.aspx *********************************************************** [Original message clipped] Reply to this message...        Iain Smallwood My understanding is also: A) If your structure contains reference objects e.g. a string, it is better to just use a string - structures are best for sets of co-ordinates etc B) MS guidelines say the overhead of copying data in value types exceeds the overhead of garbage collection once you get past 16 bytes From my point of view they are now a lot less desirable than in VB6. Any comments? Cheers, Iain -----Original Message----- From: Alex Lowe [mailto:Click here to reveal e-mail address] Sent: 29 July 2002 15:53 To: aspngvb Subject: [aspngvb] Re: Returning four values from a function... The structure is less expensive than say a class but provides much of the same functionality. The reason the structure is less expensive is that it is a value type rather than a reference type. What does this mean (value vs. reference)? Well, reference types are stored in a unique location on the managed heap (this means that the only way they are deallocated is by the garbage collector). Value types are types are stored where ever they are used (the exception being something like an array of value types - the array is stored on the managed heap - this is still different than a true reference type however because when you request a value in the array you get a copy of the value rather than a reference to the location of the value). There are other difference between the structure (value type) and say a class (reference type) that have to do with constructors, initialization, lack of inheritance, etc. So, there is a tradeoff between speed/performance and encapsulation. Generally speaking though, if all you care about is a value (or values) and you are not concerned with maintaining a unique instance of a class then a structure will do. Hth, Alex - AspFriends.com Moderation Team Microsoft MVP - ASP.NET *********************************************************** Translate C# code to VB.NET code at http://aspalliance.com/aldotnet/examples/translate.aspx *********************************************************** [Original message clipped] | [aspngvb] member Click here to reveal e-mail address = YOUR ID | http://www.asplists.com/asplists/aspngvb.asp = JOIN/QUIT Disclaimer This message may contain information which is legally privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorised disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information is strictly prohibited. Such notification not withstanding, any comments or opinions expressed are those of the originator, not of Taylor Made Computer Solutions, unless otherwise explicitly stated. Reply to this message...        joseph.gaus@dowcorning.com You're points are well made, from a performance point of view. While performance is still important, and still should be kept in mind, Microsoft has something else in mind with .NET. Best practices are no longer based on performance (though it is kept in mind), best practices with .NET include reducing programming time, both up front and from a break/fix/maintenance point of view. When looking for a solution to returning 4 values from a class, we should ask what is the most understandable, scalable (scalable in terms of upgrading code, inheriting, expanding use of code), and yes, easiest (as well as taking into account performance). While, as you argue, structures may not be the absolute fastest/best performing solution, they do tend to fit some of the other design goals of .NET in this case. I should say, I don't mean to say, you're wrong - I'm just adding to your comments, touching on the other goals of .NET. I do have a specific question about your comments. You theorize that structures are now a lot less desirable. Are they handled worse in .NET? Or did everything else get better (so they are worse by comparison)? Just curious. Your comment about copying value types v. garbage collection is interesting, do you have a source or know where more information is about that? I'd love to read more on the topic - it looks like it would have a good discussion on how a lot of things work under the hood. Thanks, Joe -----Original Message----- From: Iain Smallwood [mailto:Click here to reveal e-mail address] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:39 AM To: aspngvb Subject: [aspngvb] Re: Returning four values from a function... My understanding is also: A) If your structure contains reference objects e.g. a string, it is better to just use a string - structures are best for sets of co-ordinates etc B) MS guidelines say the overhead of copying data in value types exceeds the overhead of garbage collection once you get past 16 bytes From my point of view they are now a lot less desirable than in VB6. Any comments? Cheers, Iain -----Original Message----- From: Alex Lowe [mailto:Click here to reveal e-mail address] Sent: 29 July 2002 15:53 To: aspngvb Subject: [aspngvb] Re: Returning four values from a function... The structure is less expensive than say a class but provides much of the same functionality. The reason the structure is less expensive is that it is a value type rather than a reference type. What does this mean (value vs. reference)? Well, reference types are stored in a unique location on the managed heap (this means that the only way they are deallocated is by the garbage collector). Value types are types are stored where ever they are used (the exception being something like an array of value types - the array is stored on the managed heap - this is still different than a true reference type however because when you request a value in the array you get a copy of the value rather than a reference to the location of the value). There are other difference between the structure (value type) and say a class (reference type) that have to do with constructors, initialization, lack of inheritance, etc. So, there is a tradeoff between speed/performance and encapsulation. Generally speaking though, if all you care about is a value (or values) and you are not concerned with maintaining a unique instance of a class then a structure will do. Hth, Alex - AspFriends.com Moderation Team Microsoft MVP - ASP.NET *********************************************************** Translate C# code to VB.NET code at http://aspalliance.com/aldotnet/examples/translate.aspx *********************************************************** [Original message clipped] | [aspngvb] member Click here to reveal e-mail address = YOUR ID | http://www.asplists.com/asplists/aspngvb.asp = JOIN/QUIT Disclaimer This message may contain information which is legally privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorised disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information is strictly prohibited. Such notification not withstanding, any comments or opinions expressed are those of the originator, not of Taylor Made Computer Solutions, unless otherwise explicitly stated. | [aspngvb] member Click here to reveal e-mail address = YOUR ID | http://www.asplists.com/asplists/aspngvb.asp = JOIN/QUIT ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________ Reply to this message...        Iain Smallwood I totally agree maintenance, readability and structure are far more important that a few split seconds performance any day of the year. Experience has given me more respect for those than anything else! In response to your question it is the way that structures are assigned. The data in a value type is copied during any assignment as opposed to pointed to or referred to. But they do not have to be GC'd as they are on the stack. The benefit of the non GC thing is soon outgrown by the assignment thing. Thus if a structure is at all liable to grow, or you use reference types in it, you may as well go all the way and make a class. It is just structures were lightweight-ish way of shuffling data in VB6, function returns etc. Now this is not really the case. This is my primitive understanding distilled from MSDN, Richter, Appleman and about a thousand sources which I can barely understand (though I am getting closer now!). Sorry to not be more specific. What I would use structures for now is things like graphical transform type stuff or similar multiple number manipulation tasks (assuming we are not going APeI!). Anyone got any other good reasons to go structure, or care to contradict a simple lad? Cheers, Iain -----Original Message----- From: Click here to reveal e-mail address [mailto:Click here to reveal e-mail address] Sent: 30 July 2002 12:22 To: aspngvb Subject: [aspngvb] Re: Returning four values from a function... You're points are well made, from a performance point of view. While performance is still important, and still should be kept in mind, Microsoft has something else in mind with .NET. Best practices are no longer based on performance (though it is kept in mind), best practices with .NET include reducing programming time, both up front and from a break/fix/maintenance point of view. When looking for a solution to returning 4 values from a class, we should ask what is the most understandable, scalable (scalable in terms of upgrading code, inheriting, expanding use of code), and yes, easiest (as well as taking into account performance). While, as you argue, structures may not be the absolute fastest/best performing solution, they do tend to fit some of the other design goals of .NET in this case. I should say, I don't mean to say, you're wrong - I'm just adding to your comments, touching on the other goals of .NET. I do have a specific question about your comments. You theorize that structures are now a lot less desirable. Are they handled worse in .NET? Or did everything else get better (so they are worse by comparison)? Just curious. Your comment about copying value types v. garbage collection is interesting, do you have a source or know where more information is about that? I'd love to read more on the topic - it looks like it would have a good discussion on how a lot of things work under the hood. Thanks, Joe -----Original Message----- From: Iain Smallwood [mailto:Click here to reveal e-mail address] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:39 AM To: aspngvb Subject: [aspngvb] Re: Returning four values from a function... My understanding is also: A) If your structure contains reference objects e.g. a string, it is better to just use a string - structures are best for sets of co-ordinates etc B) MS guidelines say the overhead of copying data in value types exceeds the overhead of garbage collection once you get past 16 bytes From my point of view they are now a lot less desirable than in VB6. Any comments? Cheers, Iain -----Original Message----- From: Alex Lowe [mailto:Click here to reveal e-mail address] Sent: 29 July 2002 15:53 To: aspngvb Subject: [aspngvb] Re: Returning four values from a function... The structure is less expensive than say a class but provides much of the same functionality. The reason the structure is less expensive is that it is a value type rather than a reference type. What does this mean (value vs. reference)? Well, reference types are stored in a unique location on the managed heap (this means that the only way they are deallocated is by the garbage collector). Value types are types are stored where ever they are used (the exception being something like an array of value types - the array is stored on the managed heap - this is still different than a true reference type however because when you request a value in the array you get a copy of the value rather than a reference to the location of the value). There are other difference between the structure (value type) and say a class (reference type) that have to do with constructors, initialization, lack of inheritance, etc. So, there is a tradeoff between speed/performance and encapsulation. Generally speaking though, if all you care about is a value (or values) and you are not concerned with maintaining a unique instance of a class then a structure will do. Hth, Alex - AspFriends.com Moderation Team Microsoft MVP - ASP.NET *********************************************************** Translate C# code to VB.NET code at http://aspalliance.com/aldotnet/examples/translate.aspx *********************************************************** [Original message clipped] | [aspngvb] member Click here to reveal e-mail address = YOUR ID | http://www.asplists.com/asplists/aspngvb.asp = JOIN/QUIT Disclaimer This message may contain information which is legally privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorised disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information is strictly prohibited. Such notification not withstanding, any comments or opinions expressed are those of the originator, not of Taylor Made Computer Solutions, unless otherwise explicitly stated. | [aspngvb] member Click here to reveal e-mail address = YOUR ID | http://www.asplists.com/asplists/aspngvb.asp = JOIN/QUIT ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________ | [aspngvb] member Click here to reveal e-mail address = YOUR ID | http://www.asplists.com/asplists/aspngvb.asp = JOIN/QUIT Disclaimer This message may contain information which is legally privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorised disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information is strictly prohibited. Such notification not withstanding, any comments or opinions expressed are those of the originator, not of Taylor Made Computer Solutions, unless otherwise explicitly stated. Reply to this message...        Alex Lowe Iain and Joseph are right on and point out very valid points that I did not mention - thanks. One thing they did not touch on specicially (although Iain is onto it with the copying issue) is that a major breakdown here is when structures have to be boxed and unboxed. Read here for more information and examples (http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dndotnet/html/dotnetperftechs.a sp?frame=true#dotnetperftechs_topic8). As for the guidelines (previously mentioned by Iain) with structures, go here (http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/cpgenref/html/cpconvaluetypeusa geguidelines.asp). Basically, if the type would be more efficiently passed by reference (as in the case with large strings or other sizable values) then you will want to take advantage of a reference type. Another point for those of you migrating VB6 applications or doing some interop is that there are virtually no performance penalties when passing value types. So, you definitely don't want to pass around (between the VB6 and .NET environment) classes that will contain mostly primitive type values. Alex - AspFriends.com Moderation Team Microsoft MVP - ASP.NET *********************************************************** Translate C# code to VB.NET code at http://aspalliance.com/aldotnet/examples/translate.aspx *********************************************************** [Original message clipped] Reply to this message...     Ad MBR BootFX Best-of-breed application framework for .NET projects, developed by Matthew Baxter-Reynolds and MBR IT

Copyright © Matthew Baxter-Reynolds 2001-2008. '.NET 247 Software Development Services' is a trading style of MBR IT Solutions Ltd. Contact Us - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - www.dotnet247.com